Youth Start: Entrepreneurial Challenges project and its implementation in Portugal: evidence from field trials

Sérgio Leal, Dana Redford, Luísa Carvalho, Teresa Paiva, Cristina Soutinho, Ilda Figueiredo

Resumo


This paper analyses the implementation of the Youth Start – Entrepreneurial Challenges project1 on the learning outcomes of the students regarding their entrepreneurial skills and measures the influence of the project in teaching practice. This project promotes experiential learning programmes at the compulsory school level by developing an innovative, transferable and scalable programme through the collaboration of the high-level educational public authorities of Austria, Luxembourg, Portugal and Slovenia. The Youth Start learning programme’s modules promote the development of cognitive and non-cognitive entrepreneurial skills and abilities as well as foster a culture of responsibility and enterprise. The learning programme is hypothesised to increase desirability and feasibility of students to be entrepreneurial. In addition, it is also believed that student participants will find schoolwork more enjoyable and meaningful and that the programme will increase their motivation to learn and engage in school activities. To test whether or not the hypotheses are supported we will analyse to which extent the participants develop entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intentions, entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial mindsets. The primary target group in this three-year project are teenagers aged 14 to 17, who are reached through three large-scale interventions. Through the leadership of the ministries of education from the participating countries, the programme was extended to primary schools (students aged 8 to 11). A quasi-experimental design utilising an ex-ante and ex-post approach as well as randomised experimental groups are used to evaluate the effects on students from the secondary education level and from the second cycle of basic education (ages 10 to 11), but the focus of this paper is analysing qualitative data through in-depth interviews with Portuguese educators from different teaching education levels. This qualitative research is intended to better understand the effects of the quantitative data that the project involves and observe the impact of Youth Start programme in Portugal.

Palavras-chave


entrepreneurship education; policy experimentation; challenges; Youth Start project

Texto Completo:

PDF

Referências


Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 38(2), 217–254. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095

Bouguen, A., & Gurgand, M. (2012). Randomised controlled experiments in education.

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Retrieved from http://www2.pathfinder.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf

Elert, N., Andersson, F., & Wennberg, K. (2012). The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 111, 209–223. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.020 0

European Commission. (2016). Entrepreneurship Education at School in Europe (Eurydice report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views of future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7–8), 692–701. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.821318

Harvey, L. (2017). Researching the real world. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/methodology/

Katz, J. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 283–300.

Kools, M., & Stoll, L. (2016). What Makes a School a Learning Organisation? (OECD Education Working Papers No. 137). Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en

Martin, B. C., McNally, M. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002

McNamara, C. (2009). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Retrieved July 6, 2017, from http://managementhelp.org/businessresearch/interviews.htm

Moberg, K., Vestergaard, L., Redford, D., Cooney, T., Singer, S., Sailer, K., … Fayolle, A. (2014). How to assess and evaluate the influence of entrepreneurship education: A report of the ASTEE project with a user guide to the tools.

Mohr, L. B. (1999). The qualitative method of impact analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 69–84.

Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, C. M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2009). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54, 442–454.

Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of University-based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12021

Rosendahl-Huber, L., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2014). The effects of early entrepreneurship education: Evidence from a randomised field experiment. European Economic Review, 72, 76–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.09.002

Yin, R. (2004). Case study methods (Revised draft). Retrieved from http://www.cosmoscorp.com/docs/aeradraft.pdf